Re: Sync Rep v17

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17
Date: 2011-03-03 04:35:47
Message-ID: AANLkTin1Eax5eZzSqM4LP1wsw8-UQTAtazSQhpfagWPq@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> To achieve the effect Fujii is looking for, we would have to silently drop
> the connection. That would correctly leave the client not knowing whether
> the transaction committed or not.

Yeah, this seems to make more sense.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-03-03 06:13:28 Re: Sync Rep v17
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-03-03 04:24:16 Re: Sync Rep v17