From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SGML on functions |
Date: | 2010-08-27 20:57:29 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin11J7Fx=EXRfh1n4k6bhh9QWGSPE4N9_Vym1dZ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 27 August 2010 19:56, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> Copied from another thread...
>
> Something I've noticed is an inconsistency in the SGML markup around
> functions listed in tables. Sometimes the entire function signature
> is considered to be the function, and other times it's just the
> function name, with its parameters outside of the <function> tags.
>
> E.g.:
>
> <function>variance</function>(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)
>
> vs
>
> <function>stddev_samp(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)</function>
>
> Which way is correct?
>
I've also noticed that a lot of the <screen> contents are indented as
part of the markup, but when output in HTML, each space it recreated
as it ends up in either <code> or <pre> tags.
<programlisting> contents seem to have been intentionally entered so
that they break with the indenting style so they're output correctly.
Shouldn't tags such as <screen> follow the same style so that they can
also avoid unintentional leading whitespace?
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-08-27 22:31:24 | Re: SGML on functions |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-08-27 19:23:06 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |