From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? |
Date: | 2011-01-17 17:13:02 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin0oADtMtN=jN4eXb=K8Ef=1LtBeDdzE3T+9n7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> It seems like /contrib would be more natural, no? /bin seems like
>>> overkill because most people will not want to run it. Most of /contrib
>>> is installed already by installers, I think.
>
>> At least on Red Hat, it is packaged separately.
>
> On Red Hat, it is not packaged at all (at least not by me), and won't
> be unless it goes into contrib. I don't believe it belongs in the
> base package.
I confess to some confusion about what things "belong" where. Is
contrib the right place for this because we think it's half-baked, or
because we think most people won't use it, or just because we're
violently allergic to adding stuff to src/bin, or what?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-17 17:20:02 | Re: SSI patch version 12 |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-17 17:08:54 | Re: REVIEW: Extensions support for pg_dump |