| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
| Date: | 2010-07-02 17:07:21 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTin0d6tWsYCLiPRIsylypvoueO74BnqlYP6HNml0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:36 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
>>> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it. So, +1 to
>>> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
>>> an operator until later.
>>
>> Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
>> "slice()" is OK by me.
>
> Will this be done for Beta 3?
You forgot to attach the patch. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-07-02 18:39:23 | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-07-02 16:39:18 | Re: server authentication over Unix-domain sockets |