| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikhil S <nixmisc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database |
| Date: | 2011-02-08 09:51:29 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTin-fbfrFCJvMZhCXqJ4jqr97xgHMyXFh_9n0tOc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 08:22, Nikhil S <nixmisc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Well, the SQL does get fired against a PG database in the EDBAS mode for
>> me. I too was puzzled about the minimum version check being EDBAS specific.
>>
>
> Just checked. The version checker function checks for the version number and
> also for a bool which is set to true in EDBAS mode. So yeah, this will not
> be repro in pure Postgresql mode operations. Sorry for indicating so. But
> the issue defo comes if you try to browse a PG database in EDBAS mode.
Why would you browse a PG database in EDBAS mode? Isn't there a whole
lot of other things that would break in that case as well?
Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean with "EDBAS mode"?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-02-08 10:01:23 | Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database |
| Previous Message | Nikhil S | 2011-02-08 07:22:40 | Re: pgAdmin III: error while browsing schema of PG database |