Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Call For Talks: PGDay LA @ SCALE 9X

From: Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group <lapug(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org, pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org, seapug(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Call For Talks: PGDay LA @ SCALE 9X
Date: 2010-10-29 23:03:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: lapugpdxpugpgsql-advocacypgsql-generalseapugsfpug
PGDay is scheduled at this year's Southern California Linux Exposition
(SCALE) held in the LAX Hilton Hotel in the city of Los Angeles,
California, on Friday February 25th, 2010.

We are looking for talks designed for a general audience of web
developers, sysadmins, DBAs and open source users. Talks should have
significant technical content. This includes:

    *Interesting PostgreSQL Case Studies
    *Solutions to common problems
    *Performance, scaling and optimization
    *Using PostgreSQL with popular languages or tools
    *Replication and clustering

Talks should be 50 minutes in length.  We are also accepting 5 minute
"lightning talks".
 Talks should be submitted by January 5, 2010.  Final speakers will be
chosen by January 15, 2010.
 Post your talk submission to pgday-submissions(at)googlegroups(dot)com(dot)

Submissions should include:
    *Speaker Full Name
    *Cell Phone
    *Title of Talk
    *Description of Talk
    *Notes for Committee

For more information visit:

Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)

pdxpug by date

Next:From: gabrielleDate: 2010-11-08 23:18:42
Subject: November meeting next week!
Previous:From: gabrielleDate: 2010-10-14 20:44:21
Subject: October meeting next week!

seapug by date

Next:From: Basil BourqueDate: 2010-10-31 19:30:45
Subject: Getting number of affected records
Previous:From: Robert BernierDate: 2010-10-24 05:24:42
Subject: Re: How to do minor upgrades? 9.0.0 --> 9.0.1 (or .2)

sfpug by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-12-07 02:50:31
Subject: Upcoming SFPUGs
Previous:From: Brian GhidinelliDate: 2010-10-29 21:05:36
Subject: Re: Clustered index when not always in the WHERE clause

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-10-30 13:57:39
Subject: Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql
Previous:From: Brian HurtDate: 2010-10-29 21:37:19
Subject: Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Dale SeaburgDate: 2010-10-29 23:34:15
Subject: Paradox to postgresql interface
Previous:From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2010-10-29 22:41:00
Subject: Re: Can Postgres Not Do This Safely ?!?

lapug by date

Next:From: Juan J. NateraDate: 2010-12-07 18:04:09
Subject: Fwd: Do you use PostgreSQL PL/Perl?
Previous:From: Darmis HoskinsDate: 2010-10-29 04:44:41
Subject: Re: Daily digest v1.119 (1 messages)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group