Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache

2010/6/23 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
>> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> >> a) Eliminate WAL logging entirely
>
> If we elimiate WAL logging, that means a reinstall is required for even
> a postmaster crash, which is a new non-durable behavior.
>
> Also, we just added wal_level = minimal, which might end up being a poor
> name choice of we want wal_level = off in PG 9.1.  Perhaps we should
> have used wal_level = crash_safe in 9.0.
>
> I have added the following TODO:
>
>        Consider a non-crash-safe wal_level that eliminates WAL activity
>
>            * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00300.php
>
> --

isn't fsync to off enought?

Regards

Pavel

>  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
>  + None of us is going to be here forever. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>