| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch |
| Date: | 2010-08-12 04:58:41 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimu7oSg8wDWfaUxLnL9PTnYGWVwXmOvwzyp=PVR@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Do you think it's worth worrying about the reduction in the number of
>>> possible SI message types?
>>
>> IIRC the number of message types is the number of catalog caches plus
>> half a dozen or so. We're a long way from exhausting even a 1-byte
>> ID field; and we could play more games if we had to, since there would
>> be a padding byte free in the message types that refer to a catalog
>> cache. IOW, 1-byte id doesn't bother me.
>
> OK.
Here's an updated patch, with the invalidation changes merged in and
hopefully-suitable adjustments elsewhere.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| temprelnames-v4.patch | application/octet-stream | 85.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Boxuan Zhai | 2010-08-12 06:24:55 | Re: MERGE command for inheritance |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-08-12 04:11:47 | Re: RecordTransactionCommit() and SharedInvalidationMessages |