| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LAST CALL FOR 9.1 |
| Date: | 2011-01-15 19:25:44 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimpGL1ShZ5dmt--cfL3xXrC=X3OhgWEnXfD-05s@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:59 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2011, at 6:50 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> It is really already too late for us to be seriously considering
>> integrating sync rep into 9.1. It will lead to another enormous beta
>> period during which the tree will be closed to new patches and
>> everyone will complain, or else we'll open the tree for 9.2
>> development and a different though overlapping set of people will
>> complain about that, but if I try to bring down the gavel and actually
>> insist that we don't consider sync rep, then a third, different, also
>> overlapping set of people will complain about that.
>
> I hereby complain about your complaints about the complainers.
>
> There, you lose. ;-P
Yeah, I needed a fourth way to do that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-01-15 19:26:19 | Re: estimating # of distinct values |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-01-15 18:59:52 | Re: LAST CALL FOR 9.1 |