| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bg worker: overview |
| Date: | 2010-07-15 19:51:10 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimn6bDE17lebsiu806rH7oWKcanXp0Jx0OuIxH7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
>
> However, note that the coordinator is designed to be just a message
> passing or routing process, which should not do any kind of time
> consuming processing. It must *coordinate* things (well, jobs) and react
> promptly. Nothing else.
>
so, merging this with the autovacuum will drop our hopes of having a
time based autovacuum? not that i'm working on that nor i was thinking
on working on that... just asking to know what the implications are,
and what the future improves could be if we go this route
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-07-15 19:52:24 | Re: SHOW TABLES |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-15 19:47:20 | Re: Listen/Notify in 9.0 |