| From: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-odbc <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers |
| Date: | 2010-12-21 18:14:18 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimkLoSgPSwssXcEtdk1kPz7XCyBMpt2-pergY84@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-odbc |
While testing the waters of porting a MS-Access application to OObase.
I noticed that certain types such as Enumerated types - as well as
other types (i.e. interval), where not representable in OObase using
the JDBC driver. However, when I used the ODBC driver for OOBase all
such types were once again representable (they were represented as
text).
Is this an issues with OOBase or an issue with the representation of
complex types using the JDBC driver?
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radosław Smogura | 2010-12-22 14:11:08 | Re: Comparing Enumerated Types between JDBC and ODBC drivers |
| Previous Message | Rajesh Sundar | 2010-12-21 11:33:23 | DBLink delete record in other database |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2010-12-21 19:10:41 | Re: pgsqlodbc 09_00_0200 is twice as slow on inserts as jdbc driver |
| Previous Message | Andriy Rysin | 2010-12-21 17:29:27 | pgsqlodbc 09_00_0200 is twice as slow on inserts as jdbc driver |