Re: Any problem with the Long Integer type?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: wei725(at)lycos(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any problem with the Long Integer type?
Date: 2010-06-26 20:25:09
Message-ID: AANLkTimjhh5MfKFyGL1LaKJE9uePFs-vKPDGv3LMaiAo@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello

2010/6/26 <wei725(at)lycos(dot)com>:
>
> About four five years ago, I had received a few of emails about the data type problems on this mailing list. I believe that the problem was about a performance issue. Is any problem withe the Long Integer type in the late releases?

There is no reason why Long can be slower. Maybe you are thinking
Numeric data type.

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>
> Thanks,
>
> - w
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-06-26 23:08:18 Re: Any problem with the Long Integer type?
Previous Message wei725 2010-06-26 19:39:23 Any problem with the Long Integer type?