| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs? |
| Date: | 2011-03-22 20:15:24 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimiFjevzne7xcYPPHSNDQGKO8v7XirQy1exkDS+@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 2011/3/15 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
>>> If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the
>>> packages before I leave for PGEast.
>
>> My only hesitation about this is that it seems like sync rep and
>> collation support are both still pretty broken. Should we just not
>> worry about that for alpha?
>
> FWIW, collations are probably still several days away from being
> noticeably less broken than they were in alpha4.
How much less broken are they now?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-22 20:33:11 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-22 20:12:42 | Re: wrap alpha4 tomorrow ~9am Eastern (was: Alpha4 release blockers) |