Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
Date: 2010-08-03 23:33:23
Message-ID: AANLkTimhw4GwQNz+P1dto7nNwXf7mQzSjisWD2be6Uu-@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
>>>>
>>>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
>>
>>> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF.
>>
>> You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit,
>> but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized.  No objection
>> to pressing forward with CF work otherwise.
>
> I can hold off on those for a bit - I don't think there will be enough
> drift to matter very much, but if it makes you more comfortable, it's
> not a big deal.

I checked on these patches today and there was only one, quite trivial
conflict (and the relevant patch was not even something that was
back-patched). So I think there is not much reason to hold off any
longer on committing these.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Aglio 2010-08-03 23:52:53 press - pr: Copyedit of both documents
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-03 23:09:29 pgsql: Allow numeric to use a more compact, 2-byte header in many cases.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-03 23:52:18 Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-08-03 23:19:05 Re: merge command - GSoC progress