From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. |
Date: | 2010-08-03 23:33:23 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimhw4GwQNz+P1dto7nNwXf7mQzSjisWD2be6Uu-@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
>>>>
>>>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
>>
>>> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF.
>>
>> You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit,
>> but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized. No objection
>> to pressing forward with CF work otherwise.
>
> I can hold off on those for a bit - I don't think there will be enough
> drift to matter very much, but if it makes you more comfortable, it's
> not a big deal.
I checked on these patches today and there was only one, quite trivial
conflict (and the relevant patch was not even something that was
back-patched). So I think there is not much reason to hold off any
longer on committing these.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | User Aglio | 2010-08-03 23:52:53 | press - pr: Copyedit of both documents |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-03 23:09:29 | pgsql: Allow numeric to use a more compact, 2-byte header in many cases. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-03 23:52:18 | Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-08-03 23:19:05 | Re: merge command - GSoC progress |