Re: Sync Rep at Oct 5

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep at Oct 5
Date: 2010-10-07 09:52:34
Message-ID: AANLkTimhoQT5XSTLqrF_H9i42t4G3pnP9LOqLwx0ZzOZ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The problem is how much WAL is stored on (any) node. Currently that is
> wal_keep_segments, which doesn't work very well, but I've seen no better
> ideas that cover all important cases.

What about allowing the master to read and send WAL from the archive?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-10-07 10:07:48 Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-10-07 09:52:13 Re: Issues with Quorum Commit