Re: cvs to git migration - keywords

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs to git migration - keywords
Date: 2010-07-07 16:40:10
Message-ID: AANLkTimguLISVa4QLTsB0BC1d6hkcn8EMM-6i6TVR3iz@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> So what happens right now using the existing git repository is that
>> the $PostgeSQL$ tags are there, but they're unexpanded.  They just say
>> $PostgreSQL$ rather than $PostgreSQL: tgl blah blah$.
>
> Really?  All of them?  Seems like that would have taken some intentional
> processing somewhere.

I'm sure it did...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-07-07 17:29:04 Re: t_self as system column
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-07-07 15:41:47 Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch