Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, John Adams <john_adams_mail(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure
Date: 2010-09-04 14:16:15
Message-ID: AANLkTimgA-7q=3Ek6rfP6ONPYwwF6UYXgHp0=YXx-YKF@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Also as mentioned upthread there are effective workarounds if you poke
>> around a bit.  This is a FAQ, and there are about 3-4 solid methods
>> (if you search the archives) that cover most problems you would be
>> looking at multiple results sets to solve.  I suppose this is why
>> there hasn't been more of an effort to do this earlier.  People asking
>> for this are typically dispossessed SQL server developers who haven't
>> quite gotten used to the postgres way of things. Not that proper
>> stored procedures wouldn't be great -- they would be -- but they are
>> not the only way to solve these types of problems.
>
> I had a prototype that can do multirecordset. But implementation of
> non transact procedures needs a hundreds  hours of work:
>
> * outer SPI
> * parametrization for non planner statements - for CALL statement
> * explicit transaction control for procedures.
> * client API support for multirecordset
> * better support for OUT variables.

Curious: is mulitset handling as you see it supported by the current
v3 protocol?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-04 15:00:55 Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-04 14:10:14 Re: returning multiple result sets from a stored procedure