| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2010-09-18 22:20:47 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimeXTFQ3rybVJJQDQhoeh+6gU4_UvuUNsRvyP9K@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> There are considerable benefits to having a standby registry with a
> table-like interface. Â Particularly, one where we could change
> replication via UPDATE (or ALTER STANDBY) statements.
I think that using a system catalog for this is going to be a
non-starter, but we could use a flat file that is designed to be
machine-editable (and thus avoid repeating the mistake we've made with
postgresql.conf).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-09-18 23:08:45 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-09-18 21:42:08 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-18 22:35:51 | Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-09-18 21:42:08 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |