Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-01 02:14:33
Message-ID: AANLkTimePa26H_rqsRjFc6cF2jP=Rmf+p2OOkqiB4RPv@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks!

I'll wait for the merging then; there is no point in benchmarking otherwise.

Regards

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> There are patches, and the latest from Fujii Masao is probably worth
> >> looking at :)
> >
> > I am pretty sure, however, that the performance will be terrible at
> > this point. Heikki is working on fixing that, but it ain't done yet.
>
> Yep. The latest WIP code is available in my git repository, but it's
> not worth benchmarking yet. I'll need to merge Heikki's effort and
> the synchronous replication patch.
>
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/fujii/postgres.git
> branch: synchrep
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
> NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-01 04:14:50 Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-01 01:14:12 Re: [BUGS] Estimation of Plan quality