Re: GSoC - code of implementation of materialized views

From: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, Pavel Baroš <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSoC - code of implementation of materialized views
Date: 2010-06-30 07:06:57
Message-ID: AANLkTimd4RTad1XxTgDbZ2jwCSvBDgml6GmiNHiD-vHZ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/6/30 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> By the way, does the SQL standard say anything about materialized views?

AFAIK, nope. Probably for the same reason that indexes are not
mentioned by the standard: both are only performance enhancements, and
one could easily imagine future SQL database systems that manage their
creation and removal automatically (based on usage patterns or
available disk space or somesuch).

Nicolas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-06-30 07:51:32 Re: Keepalives win32
Previous Message Pavel Golub 2010-06-30 06:32:14 Re: Keepalives win32