Re: Need Some Recent Information on the Differences between Postgres and MySql

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, John Gage <jsmgage(at)numericable(dot)fr>, "Wang, Mary Y" <mary(dot)y(dot)wang(at)boeing(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need Some Recent Information on the Differences between Postgres and MySql
Date: 2010-06-25 15:56:08
Message-ID: AANLkTimcqN190RgezFc3C1C3td63yBjamZTfsxDCZZVU@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> - Innodb : The primary transactional storage engine for MySQL. It does
> not have all the features of PG (like check contraints), but it has
> some features (like Compression!!!) which are *exceptionally* useful.

You do know that pg has compression for text types built in already,
right? I'm sure there are subtle differences in the way compression
is done in each engine, just pointing that out.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-06-25 15:56:46 Re: PG dump and restore
Previous Message Rob Wultsch 2010-06-25 15:48:11 Re: Need Some Recent Information on the Differences between Postgres and MySql