| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: high-availability.sgml: misplaced sentence |
| Date: | 2010-06-27 00:43:01 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimaxmUc4SkC2HEQU4kArzlAWFd85RiQslqBNf4I@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> The middle sentence in the 'Note:' doesn't make much sense there (maybe it does when you know
> pg_standby). In any case it seems better placed outside it.
I think the reason why that sentence is there is to explain WHY you
shouldn't try to use pg_standby with the built-in standby mode. I
agree that maybe the paragraph before the note could stand to be
fleshed out a bit - the phrase "a simple command" certainly might not
be totally clear to someone. But it's important for the note to
mention why pg_standby would not be suitable.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-06-28 17:03:47 | Re: documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-06-26 16:52:38 | high-availability.sgml: misplaced sentence |