Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum full warning

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum full warning
Date: 2011-01-21 13:46:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:30, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:22, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> I came across yet another case of "i did vacuum full because it seemed
>>>> like a good idea" today.. Urgh.
>>>> What do you guys think of a patch like the attached, which throws a
>>>> warning when you run vacuum full from the maintenance dialog on a
>>>> pre-9.0 version?
>>> Something like that should be a guru hint shouldn't it?
>> Hmm. That might be an idea. I always turn those off because the
>> majority of them are just annoying ;)
>> Where the heck is the *source* for the guru hints stored?
> docs/xxxx/hints.

Meh. So why didn't mym "git grep" find that.. *annoyance*.

Anyway. Something like this, then? Am I missing something still?

 Magnus Hagander

Attachment: vacuum_full.patch
Description: text/x-patch (2.9 KB)

In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-01-21 14:01:44
Subject: Re: Vacuum full warning
Previous:From: pgAdmin TracDate: 2011-01-21 13:19:37
Subject: [pgAdmin III] #299: Crash on table refresh

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group