Re: Vacuum full warning

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum full warning
Date: 2011-01-21 14:01:44
Message-ID: AANLkTikP+EjVwqJU2MGpYDpWGBZYJ-HVRuPM=rqv_qra@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:30, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:22, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>>> I came across yet another case of "i did vacuum full because it seemed
>>>>> like a good idea" today.. Urgh.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you guys think of a patch like the attached, which throws a
>>>>> warning when you run vacuum full from the maintenance dialog on a
>>>>> pre-9.0 version?
>>>>
>>>> Something like that should be a guru hint shouldn't it?
>>>
>>> Hmm. That might be an idea. I always turn those off because the
>>> majority of them are just annoying ;)
>>>
>>> Where the heck is the *source* for the guru hints stored?
>>
>> docs/xxxx/hints.
>
> Meh. So why didn't mym "git grep" find that.. *annoyance*.
>
> Anyway. Something like this, then? Am I missing something still?

At least a change to the installer source to add the new file. Do we
need something for Makefile.am as well, or are we using a wildcard
there?

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-21 14:09:07 Re: Vacuum full warning
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-21 13:46:17 Re: Vacuum full warning