| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Recovery bug |
| Date: | 2010-10-19 08:31:07 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimYZr2XzBcAHfzdXFSdx8-7VqE5gwY+uAq+b5GW@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 19.10.2010 08:51, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Jeff Davis<pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do users have any expectation that they can restore a backup without
>>>>> using recovery.conf by merely having the WAL segments in pg_xlog?
>>>>
>>>> I would expect that to work.
>>
>> What's the use case?
>
> Creating a stand-alone backup tarball that contains both the base backup and
> all WAL files required to restore.
Oh, I had forgotten that case. Thanks. I'd drop my proposal.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-10-19 09:26:48 | Re: Recovery bug |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-10-19 08:18:39 | Re: Recovery bug |