Re: Adjusted the hackers mailing list

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adjusted the hackers mailing list
Date: 2010-06-17 17:17:50
Message-ID: AANLkTimW__gDc1HmUC7YqymhepCy_oLFNHLjslyHOtCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
>> You may have noticed some old emails just showing up
>> on the hackers list. They were held because their
>> "header lines were too long." I've just changed the limits
>> on the hackers list as follows:
>
>> max_header_line_length from 1024 to 2048
>> max_mime_header_length from 1024 to 2048
>
>> The trapped messages were at lengths of 1030 or so.
>
> Actually, long threads tend to run into that restriction on all the
> lists --- it's the References: lines that get long.  If we're going to
> increase the limit (which I agree with) please do it across the board
> not just for -hackers.

I think we shouldn't raise it to 10240 rather than just 2048. I mean,
what are we afraid of with long headers, that the mail servers will
run out of memory on a 1k header?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-06-17 17:41:41 Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-17 17:06:28 Re: Adjusted the hackers mailing list