Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Charles(dot)McDevitt(at)emc(dot)com
Cc: sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, mbanck(at)debian(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Date: 2011-02-12 00:14:11
Message-ID: AANLkTimTOet+7+G3yGZzaLprRt2a+2NdcFC_bDBsd_iR@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:07 AM, <Charles(dot)McDevitt(at)emc(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is just libelous FUD. There's absolutely no reason postgres would
>> have to be GPL'd to satisfy any library license.
>
> Ok, but be aware that readline is GPL v3, not GPL v2, and has those additional requirements.

No

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles.McDevitt 2011-02-12 00:15:06 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous Message Charles.McDevitt 2011-02-12 00:07:07 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage