| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: About our GSoC projects |
| Date: | 2010-08-18 08:25:20 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimRdo3X3_A5T+YoZfhxNh1FK3NHe-aHJQNtDusL@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> You are supposed to work by having one "his branch" on his repo and
> one "gleus branch" on your repo. Then you merge with his, and if you
> make changes, he merges with yours, back and forth until you agree on
> something that's good. At that point, you merge this (with squash,
> please :P) into the main repository and push that.
That seems like a nice way to waste a lot of time.
>> If I understood correctly, yeah, I would like that to happen. The
>> sooner, the better. I don't really know if we should use the same
>> account or a different one. I actually don't care.
>
> Dave, any comment on that?
The same account seems fine to me.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-18 08:32:05 | Re: About our GSoC projects |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-18 08:20:42 | Re: About our GSoC projects |