Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Date: 2010-10-04 08:24:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located.  Previously
>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index.  I also
>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>> as per this discussion:
>> .
>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>> unsorted function tables.
> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.

Is this on the radar?  Copying in -hackers in case.

Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-04 17:32:34
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-09-30 23:58:36
Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2010-10-04 09:28:05
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Previous:From: Itagaki TakahiroDate: 2010-10-04 08:17:06
Subject: Re: patch: psql variables tabcomplete

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group