| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
| Date: | 2010-10-04 08:24:49 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimRNfHfZP4Lt7-s1C4xoQCJcGOyyJkWKuHdxtP9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously
>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also
>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>> as per this discussion:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php .
>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>>
>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>> unsorted function tables.
>
> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.
Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-04 17:32:34 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-09-30 23:58:36 | Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2010-10-04 09:28:05 | Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-10-04 08:17:06 | Re: patch: psql variables tabcomplete |