| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 1.12.1? |
| Date: | 2010-09-27 16:59:51 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimPgNBCQNpAY0gV2emzNHGqFrn7XzWUfHV1hQ4=@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 27/09/2010 18:20, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> Le 27/09/2010 17:10, Dave Page a écrit :
>>>> We're building PostgreSQL 9.0.1 on Friday. Do we want to push out a
>>>> pgAdmin update to coincide?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could be interesting to get the 6 bugfixes out. See
>>> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/query?status=closed&group=resolution&milestone=1.12.1
>>> for details.
>>>
>>> Just looking at the CHANGELOG. Grmbl, I don't find the fixes in the
>>> CHANGELOG file. I must have forgotten to update the file. Should I do it
>>> afterwards?
>>
>> Yes please!
>>
>
> Done.
OK, I'll look at wrapping 1.12.1 on Thursday.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-09-27 17:23:57 | Re: 1.12.1? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-27 16:51:50 | Re: Documentation |