Re: PS display and standby query conflict

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PS display and standby query conflict
Date: 2010-12-17 13:35:16
Message-ID: AANLkTimO_xxS5V61r6dkNf0Fo2WfHi-wD6=4=8_-WeJ1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> But if it annoys you, it seems OK to change it. Don't see a reason to backpatch though?
>
> I think that It's worth backpatch to prevent users who observe the
> occurrence of the query conflicts carefully for testing 9.0 from
> getting confusing.

I don't think this is important enough to back-patch, but it does seem
like a good idea in general, so committed, but just to the master
branch.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-12-17 13:36:06 Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-17 13:34:32 pgsql: Reset 'ps' display just once when resolving VXID conflicts.