From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Count backend self-sync calls |
Date: | 2010-11-15 01:31:42 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimOVcjatpEf=W_oGCJhEXr_Z_MbrJ_yrFCuG5JY@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> It might be even better to mention that the reason why we couldn't
>> forward the fsync request is that the fsync request queue is full.
>> I'm not sure exactly how to phrase that. I thought about:
>
>> fsync request queue is full
>
>> But that seems not to answer the "so what" question. There is an
>> example like this in the docs:
>
>> could not forward fsync request (fsync request queue is full)
>
>> ...but I'm not sure I like that.
>
> Well, that example is meant to cover cases where you have to assemble a
> couple of independently created phrases. In this case I'd suggest
> could not forward fsync request because request queue is full
Sounds good to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-15 02:09:22 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-15 01:31:09 | Re: Count backend self-sync calls |