From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |
Date: | 2011-01-20 19:03:48 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimO5Dm_Lmd8Pbo0p1f0HEQb5ZnDK2KnuzqffkqH@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2011/1/20 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> I pretty much agree with you -- but not all people can use cli, or can
> maintain Slony-I using altperl tools.
I use the command line for lots of things, but I also find GUI tools
like PgAdmin useful. For example, I have a strong preference for
developing Postgres functions using PgAdmin. I think that I have a
rather balanced view. I also think that the ability to organise things
in a slonik script in a way that makes sense for you (ordering things
in a domain specific, logical manner with plenty of comments) is just
easier than doing it the PgAdmin way for any person, not just a person
who has a general preference for using command line tools. If you
don't agree with this, try managing Slony replication for more than 2
or 3 nodes using PgAdmin.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-20 19:03:51 | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2011-01-20 18:39:23 | Re: Support for Slony 2.0? |