| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: multiset patch review |
| Date: | 2011-02-04 18:04:10 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimNfhF+xJFydqi5j_uTYuazp8aMD6ZjAPvDUiKj@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 02:29, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I am still not in favor of adding this syntax.
>
> I also don't like the syntax, but unfortunately, almost all of
> them are in the SQL standard :-(.
The standard specifies this syntax for arrays, or for multisets?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-04 18:04:54 | Re: SSI performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-04 18:04:09 | Re: more buildfarm breakage |