| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wiki clarification |
| Date: | 2011-02-27 11:24:40 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimMmyB5=pEkpGCHLyQ0GT49wmZrO0rRWfeLRR9D@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:32, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:55 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> > From my own point of view, I'm not even sure what a "commercial abuse"
>> > of the wiki would consist of. If a company wants to
>> > advertise/brag/hype/promote a product which is based on Postgres on
>> > the wiki, how is that a detriment to the project, exactly?
>>
>> Yeah, good point.
>
> Exactly, we are known to be a commercially friendly project -- BSD
> License and all.
Sure. We'll still need a pretty well-defined policy, though, IMNSHO.
We need something to point to when $company dumps copies of all their
marketing material in there, for example, making the search even worse
than it is now (if that's even possible :P).
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-02-27 11:28:12 | Re: Wiki clarification |
| Previous Message | Susanne Ebrecht | 2011-02-27 09:35:25 | .oO - Translation |