Re: Sync Rep v19

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19
Date: 2011-03-04 21:53:59
Message-ID: AANLkTimM-NP6iLTJG0FjyZFtnwJ1woPC6BnfUUa+2wYd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The patch sets "*" as the default, so all standbys are synchronous by
>>> default.
>>>
>>> Would you prefer it if it was blank, meaning no standbys are
>>> synchronous, by default?
>>
>> I think * is a reasonable default.
>>
>
> Actually i would prefer to have standbys asynchronous by default...
> though is true that there will be no waits until i set
> synchronous_replication to on... 1) it could be confusing to see a
> SYNC standby in pg_stat_replication by default when i wanted all of
> them to be async, 2) also * will give priority 1 to all standbys so it
> doesn't seem like a very useful out-of-the-box configuration, better
> to make the dba to write the standby names in the order they want

Mmm, good points.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2011-03-04 22:20:14 Re: Sync Rep v19
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2011-03-04 21:18:39 Re: Sync Rep v19