Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-06-28 18:55:59
Message-ID: AANLkTimLmGUgwGDIx3jmnaQXc9FJSa8iNn90JiczgZbx@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ... It is even more unreasonable to commit to
>> providing a timely patch (twice) and then fail to do so.  We are
>> trying to finalize a release here, and you've made it clear you think
>> this code needs revision before then.  I respect your opinion, but not
>> your right to make the project release timetable dependent on your own
>> schedule, and not your right to shut other people out of working on
>> the issues you've raised.
>
> Since nobody has put forward a proposed beta3 release date, I don't feel
> that I'm holding anything up.  In the meantime, I have many
> responsibilities and am facing Red Hat internal deadlines.

See here, last paragraph:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-06/msg01093.php

On a related note, this list is getting pretty darn short:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items

...partly because, in my desire to get another beta out, I have been
devoting a lot of time to clearing it out.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-28 18:56:10 Re: Propose Beta3 for July
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-06-28 18:53:29 Re: Propose Beta3 for July