Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option
Date: 2010-07-23 11:36:45
Message-ID: AANLkTimFy1S4B83-iB1Lf9-u62uHcsjXRK9VW8NDPQFH@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/7/23 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> What I wanted to say is the patch itself is fine but we need to make consensus
> before the detailed code reviewing.

I guess we probably need some more people to express an opinion, then.
Do you have one?

I'm not sure I do, yet. I'd like to hear the patch author's response
to Itagaki Takahiro's question upthread: "Why don't you use just "echo
'options' >> $PGDATA/postgresql.conf" ? Could you explain where the
-C options is better than initdb + echo?"

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-07-23 11:44:51 Re: security label support, part.2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-07-23 11:06:19 Re: Add column if not exists (CINE)