Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite
Date: 2010-07-17 20:26:17
Message-ID: AANLkTimBZvb554biF3gZyVfFdAdswnj9AZdC03UVUzXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 17 July 2010 21:23, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> While they're quite attractive, I actually see them being more
>> confusing than helpful personally, but I could be wrong.  I reckon
>> there might be clearer ways of representing statement options.  The
>> real problems with the railroad design come when there are lots of
>> references to other diagrams, and you end up with about 10 just for 1
>> statement.
>>
>> Is there a way of testing their usefulness?
>
> Personal experience? I used to find them quite useful when I was
> starting out with Informix.
>

I guess I'm quite used to the existing statement definitions. It's an
elegant idea, just wondering if it scales sanely. Are the examples of
more complex statements?

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Conway 2010-07-17 20:30:48 Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-07-17 20:23:32 Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite