Re: The page: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL_2009 Is inappropiate

From: Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: fabio mariotti <fab(dot)mariotti(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fabio Mariotti <mariotti(dot)fabio(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: The page: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL_2009 Is inappropiate
Date: 2010-11-10 17:06:57
Message-ID: AANLkTimB4Te7NLvpf0rd31+-YixSWvboFwHAv2f9xQcS@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:53 PM, fabio mariotti <fab(dot)mariotti(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If you do joins where covering indexes are very useful, then MySQL is
> probably the correct database for you.

s/joins/queries/ , but you get the point.

--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-10 19:42:35 Re: Suggested changes to Book pages
Previous Message Rob Wultsch 2010-11-10 16:02:32 Re: The page: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL_2009 Is inappropiate