Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array
Date: 2010-11-24 02:38:27
Message-ID: AANLkTimAmnVR6Zxm0P3kNAx_zLz_PkW1FqxhieWitAJk@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/11/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> ok, I can only recapitulate so this feature was proposed cca two
>>> months ago, and minimally Tom and maybe you did agreement - with
>>> request on syntax - do you remember? I am little bit tired so this
>>> agreement was changed when I spent my time with this.
>>
>> I went back and reread the thread I believe you're speaking about.
>> The first post is here:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01945.php
>
> Here perhaps ? (or before)
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01983.php

Dang. You're right. I stand corrected.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-11-24 02:54:47 Re: security hooks on object creation
Previous Message Josh Kupershmidt 2010-11-24 02:37:57 Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql