| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
| Date: | 2010-07-22 13:09:55 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim8o=rZLcSz+DzAgBBFnAuxV3-MuE4Wn+5J7h7M@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:06 PM, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié jul 21 10:24:26 -0400 2010:
>>> On tis, 2010-07-20 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> It's tempting to propose making .psqlrc apply only in interactive
>>>> mode, period. But that would be an incompatibility with previous
>>>> releases, and I'm not sure it's the behavior we want, either.
>>>
>>> What is a use case for having .psqlrc be read in noninteractive use?
>>
>> Even if there weren't one, why does it get applied to -f but not -c?
>> They're both noninteractive.
>
>
> So not to let the thread drop, it appears that we're faced with the following situation:
Hmm. I thought we almost had consensus on changing the historical
behavior of -c. If we do that, this all gets much simpler.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-22 13:23:50 | Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-22 13:03:18 | Re: little mistakes in HS/SR |