| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Srinivas Naik <naik(dot)srinu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reg: SQL Query for Postgres 8.4.3 |
| Date: | 2010-05-04 14:42:40 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim4SANgrDEK_T_EJczzIkPk5H4lJpHqE6wgwbat@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> We have maintained nonstandard behavior in the past for
> compatibility reasons, so it's a fair question; however, I'm
> inclined toward the standard on this one.
In a case like this, it seems unlikely that someone would be counting
on a negative value to throw an error, so I tend to regard doing
something else as an extension of the standard rather than a deviation
from it. But I don't have strong feelings about it.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-04 15:07:47 | Re: Reg: SQL Query for Postgres 8.4.3 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-04 14:42:29 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |