| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions in status view |
| Date: | 2010-06-17 12:52:40 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim0zOS5mhrBYwOKWQHdp6afQbiDQF2Ewm0jp9ra@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 14:51, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 17/06/2010 14:28, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> In the status view of pgadmin, one pane/window/whateverwecallthem is
>>> labeled "Transactions". But it actually only holds two-phase
>>> transactions. That's misleading, I've had questions about why regular
>>> transactions don't show up there.
>>>
>>> I suggest we rename it. But to what? "Two phase transactions"?
>>> "Prepared transactions"?
>>
>> The latter sounds good to me.
>>
>
> +1 for "prepared transactions".
Where are we wrt the new release - are we in string freeze or is it ok
to make this change now?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-06-17 13:30:24 | Re: Transactions in status view |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-06-17 12:51:04 | Re: Transactions in status view |