| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
| Date: | 2010-06-22 01:16:22 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTilxKOWzU-OWJzDKW8SZswvbBa-xO7ABqFJ9eDV4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> So none of the above sounds like desired behavior to me... is that just me?
>
> Yeah, I'm not really thrilled with this.. I mentioned earlier what I
> thought would be a useful feature (basically, a switch which would
> ignore the main psqlrc and turn on the various options that make sense
> for a script), but that seems to have fallen to the wayside..
Well, that might be a good idea, too, but my expectation is that:
psql -f one -f two -f three
ought to behave in a manner fairly similar to:
cat one two three > all
psql -f all
and it sounds like with this patch that's far from being the case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-22 02:18:46 | missing "else" in postmaster.c? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-06-22 01:13:10 | Re: Explicit psqlrc |