| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
| Date: | 2010-06-04 20:22:38 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTilvXSFPKmYHZ8r-hEndXCYKQZp9P_jDs3pEJy6F@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6/3/2010 10:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/27/2010 4:31 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Also, what would be cool would be if you could run a query on the master
>>>> to view the SR commit mode of each slave.
>>>
>>> What would be the use case for such a query?
>>
>> Monitoring?
>
> So that justifies adding code, that the community needs to maintain and
> document, to the core system. If only I could find some monitoring case for
> transaction commit orders ... sigh!
Dude, I'm not the one arguing with you... actually I don't think
anyone really is, any more, except about details.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2010-06-04 20:27:17 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2010-06-04 20:20:30 | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user |