| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthew Woodcraft <matthew(at)woodcraft(dot)me(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Views and Privileges |
| Date: | 2010-06-28 19:26:36 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTilmJK3f0mod7S5KH3M0gFstNdHOjladhhpe7SDI@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Matthew Woodcraft
<matthew(at)woodcraft(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> The fact that views run with the privileges of the view owner is a bit
> hidden in the documentation.
>
> It isn't mentioned in /3.2 Views/, which makes sense as privileges
> haven't been introduced yet.
>
> It is explained in /37.4 Rules and Privileges/, but I think most people
> using views won't have reason to read the docs on rules.
>
> I can't find any other reference to it.
>
> How about having a section under /20. Database Roles and Privileges/ on
> views and privileges?
I don't see an obvious way to fit it in there, although it doesn't
seem like a bad idea. I also wonder if we should mention something in
the reference pages for GRANT and REVOKE - at least a cross-reference
to the correct section of the documentation.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-06-30 22:18:07 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-06-28 17:03:47 | Re: documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile |