Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hot standby documentation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hot standby documentation
Date: 2010-06-23 19:05:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 14:24 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Fixed.  See attached.
> I started reading this but by chunk seven I only agree with a couple of
> these changes. None of them seem hugely important changes.
> I'd suggest you make a pass of copy editing that doesn't seek to alter
> the meanings or add information, so we can agree without discussing each
> proposed change in detail. Definitely don't remove information.

I've actually removed very little.  The current text repeats some
information or splits up related facts across different paragraphs.

> It's not impossible to believe that temp tables could be written in the
> future, so I disagree with the comments there.

The text I wrote does not say that temp tables could not be written in
the future.  It simply says why they cannot be written now.

> We could also allow SELECT ... FOR SHARE during Hot Standby, simply by
> making it same as normal SELECT, without any ill effects.


Robert Haas
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-06-23 19:14:41
Subject: Re: hot standby documentation
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-06-23 18:53:54
Subject: Re: hot standby documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group