| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: slow query performance |
| Date: | 2010-06-10 16:42:02 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTilRWJ2ecRDCJkbXPZ3EhsEv2Vhr2oKTS72iTJPd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached
Hmm. Well, I'm not quite sure what's going on here, but I think you
must be using a modified verison of PostgreSQL, because, as Tom
pointed out upthread, we don't have a data type called "timestamp with
time area". It would be called "timestamp with time zone".
Can we see the index and table definitions of the relevant tables
(attached as a text file) and the size of each one (use select
pg_relation_size('name'))?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-10 16:44:27 | Re: Performance tuning for postgres |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-06-10 16:34:47 | Re: Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4? |