Re: 8.3.7, 'cache lookup failed' for a table

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
Cc: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.3.7, 'cache lookup failed' for a table
Date: 2010-05-12 10:19:01
Message-ID: AANLkTilO9CpCY7ILkXEGSy5mTX0sqYIZrte9oy-96Og2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Alban Hertroys
<dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl> wrote:
> On 12 May 2010, at 12:01, Glyn Astill wrote:
>
>> Did you not mention that this server was a slony slave at some point though?
>>
>> Just because you have removed slony, and the error comes from postgresql itself does not mean the corruption was not caused by misuse of slony.
>
> Indeed. I wonder if "when we ere adding/removing slony to the system for Nth time (due to it sometimes going out of sync)" may be caused by that as well.
>

ok, so either upgrade to newer version of slony, or drop all tables,
and recreate them every time slony is removed and readded to the
database.

And I guess the only reason postgresql doesn't like it, is due to
slony's behavior.

thanks guys.

--
GJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Koichi Suzuki 2010-05-12 10:21:10 Bug-fix and new feature of pg_lesslog is released
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-05-12 10:14:29 Re: Documentation availability as a single page of text